Renting versus buying: Theoretical foundations of rational choice across countries

The choice between renting and buying a home remains one of the key decisions in a person’s life, and in the context of globalization it has become even more difficult. Citizens are increasingly faced with the question: is it worth burdening yourself with property or is it more profitable to remain mobile and flexible? The answer depends not only on the level of income, but also on the country of residence, economic conditions, and personal strategy.

Rationality of choice is no longer limited to mortgage calculations. Modern scientific approaches propose to take into account behavioral attitudes, government incentives, macroeconomic instability, and cultural codes. This article offers an analytical look at when ownership is justified and when renting a property is a more strategically reasonable choice.

Economic logic: cost of ownership and rent

The main economic argument for buying is the creation of a long-term asset and avoiding rental expenses. However, it is important to understand that home ownership carries not only benefits, but also risks: decreased liquidity, depreciation of the property, taxes and repair obligations. In some countries, these costs may exceed the potential benefit.

Renting, on the other hand, eliminates the need for a large down payment and provides flexibility. However, long-term lease payments can be comparable to a mortgage. The rational choice depends on a comparison of total costs, including the opportunity cost of invested capital and the appreciation of the property’s market value.

An additional factor is the dynamics of the markets. In developing countries, real estate often appreciates faster than in stable economies, and this makes buying more attractive. And in countries with high prices and low property yields, renting may be preferable.

Financial parameters influencing the choice:

●     Amount of down payment

●     The level of the mortgage rate and its fixation

●     Projected rise in housing prices

●     Comparative Cost of Renting and Owning

Public policy and institutional incentives

The decision between buying and renting is largely determined by government policy. In countries with strong mortgage support, subsidies and tax deductions, home ownership becomes the priority scenario. This is especially true in the United States, where buying is often seen as a “social norm.”

At the same time, countries with active rental policies (e.g. Germany or Switzerland) create a legal and economic environment in which the tenant is protected and the market is transparent and stable. Here, renting is perceived as a rational and respectful choice, not a temporary solution.

The state’s influence can also be seen in regulating tenants’ rights, controlling rental growth, and developing social housing funds. These measures make renting housing more attractive, especially for young and mobile professionals.

Forms of state support that determine preferences:

●     Tax incentives for owners or tenants

●     Social mortgage or subsidy programs

●     Protecting the rights of long-term tenants

●     Controlling the growth of rental costs

Behavioural Economics: How We Make Decisions

In practice, consumer behavior does not always correspond to rational models. Many make decisions about buying or renting based on emotional factors: the desire for stability, the fear of missing out, social pressure. This explains the popularity of buying housing even where it is economically unprofitable.

Behavioural economics points to common biases, such as overvaluing the value of ownership or underestimating the risks associated with a mortgage. People tend to overestimate the benefits of having their own corner of the house, especially in countries with a deeply rooted culture of private property.

Renting is often underestimated as an option, due to stigma or fear of instability. However, in the digital age, renting is becoming a service with a high level of convenience and predictability, which partially offsets these prejudices.

The most common behavioral distortions are:

●     The “own” effect – overestimation of the value of ownership

●     Planning distortion – underestimation of debt burden

●     Social expectations – peer pressure

●     Habituation to old patterns of behavior

Cultural differences and perceptions of housing

The attitude towards ownership and renting largely depends on cultural codes. In the countries of Southern Europe, Eastern Europe and the post-Soviet space, ownership is traditionally considered a symbol of stability and maturity. Here, renting is perceived as a temporary measure associated with uncertainty or low status.

On the contrary, in a number of Western European countries, such as Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, renting is a well-established model, often used even by high-income families. The key factor here is the long-term protection of the tenant’s rights and the low level of social stigma.

Cultural differences also manifest themselves in intergenerational attitudes. Older generations tend to accumulate and own, while younger generations value mobility, turnkey rentals, and the ability to quickly change residence.

Cultural patterns that influence choice:

●     Perception of real estate as a heritage

●     The relationship between housing and social identity

●     Level of trust in rental relationships

●     The role of tradition and family expectations

Globalization and population mobility

The modern world implies high mobility – both professional and geographical. More and more people live in different countries, work remotely, change cities and continents. In such conditions, owning a home can become a burden that limits freedom.

Renting provides the necessary flexibility: a person can live where his work or education is located, without burdening himself with complex legal processes. This is especially important for specialists in the field of technology, science, education, startups.

On the other hand, globalization is leading to increased investment interest in real estate. Owning a home is seen as a way to protect capital, especially in countries with unstable currencies. This creates a paradox: tenants become investors in other markets.

Factors of global mobility:

●     Remote work and digital professions

●     International educational programs

●     Immigration regimes and visa policies

●     Simplifying International Housing Transactions

Rational Choice Scenarios: A Comparative Analysis

There is no universal answer to whether renting or buying is better. Rational choice depends on many parameters, including income level, age, professional goals, future plans, and national economy. A scientific approach requires evaluating scenarios taking these variables into account.

In countries with growing markets and high inflation, buying is often more profitable: housing serves as capital protection. In stable economies where price growth is low, renting may be preferable, especially with a short planning horizon.

It is also important to consider the risks: mortgage dependence, losses on sale, maintenance costs. In some cases, renting gives a better result with lower obligations. The main criterion is the flexibility of the strategy in the context of long-term goals.

Examples of rational scenarios:

●     Young professional working in different countries – rent

●     Family with children in a stable city – purchase

●     Investor with currency risks – buying abroad

●     Senior with limited income – long term rental

The rationality of choosing between renting and buying is not arithmetic, but a strategic task that involves economics, culture, psychology and global processes. There are no universal solutions: it is important to understand your own goals and act in the context of the specific circumstances of the country and the market.

A scientific approach to this choice helps to avoid emotional mistakes and to form a sustainable strategy that corresponds to the realities of the digital and mobile world. Today, more than ever, housing is not only a space, but also a way of thinking.

Questions and Answers